https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/29650 Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:14:19 GMT 2026-04-20T01:14:19Z https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/29906 Заглавие документа: Роль иностранных прямых инвестиций в экономике Китая Авторы: Сапожникова, Екатерина Юрьевна Аннотация: The article is devoted to economic cooperation of China with the Pacific Rim countries in the field of attraction of foreign capital. The Chinese government provides conditions for attraction and use of the investments, combining incentive measures with measures of restriction, administrative control with active use of economic levers and stimuli in order to influence territorial and branch accommodation of the investments. Primary factors, stimulating the inflow of foreign investors to the People's Republic of China, are the capacity of the market, rather low cost of labor, a favorable currency rate, the tariff rates and political stability. The government of China encourages both attracting foreign investments and the investment in other countries, according to the tasks of economic development of the country. The attraction of direct foreign investments allows to accelerate structural reorganization of national economy, first of all, of industrial production, to expand an export potential and, eventually, to strengthen the role of China in the world economy. Доп. сведения: Раздел - "Международные отношения" Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 GMT https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/29906 2000-01-01T00:00:00Z https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/29904 Заглавие документа: Технологическое сотрудничество в Азиатско-Тихоокеанском регионе: опыт для Российской Федерации и СНГ Авторы: Спивак, Ростислав Борисович Аннотация: Science and technology are seen to be central features of any development strategy. The USA and Japan are the most technologically advanced countries in the world and a major source of new technologies for the rest of Asian-Pacific region. Flows of direct investment and production "know-how" have been key factors underpinning the success of the region as a whole. The Newly Industrial Economies and the ASEAN, with their massive investment in infrastructure and human capital, had domestic capability to learn and exploit foreign technology. The governments of these countries also provided stable macroeconomic environments and industrial policies that were supportive of technology-led development. The most advanced countries are supporting the long-term fundamental research needed to underpin the industries of the 21st century. This article also focuses on acquisition routes of technology from advanced countries, reluctance of Multi- National Corporation to purchase locally manufactured goods in the host country and to transfer new technologies. Доп. сведения: Раздел - "Международные отношения" Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 GMT https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/29904 2000-01-01T00:00:00Z https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/29903 Заглавие документа: Единение Беларуси и России: проблемы и перспективы Авторы: Прибытковский, Феликс Зенонович Аннотация: This article includes the information about the "round table" of Russian and Belarusian scholars in the sphere of international relations. The form discussed the problems of future Russian-Belarusian relations after the ratification of the Agreement about the creation of the Union State. The discussion consisted of three sessions: the first — "Political Aspects of Russian-Belarusian Relations"; the second — "Economic Problems of Russian- Belarusian Relations"; the third — "International and Juridical Aspects of the Union State". The main conclusion of the "round table"consists in the assertion that the creation of the Union State requires not only long time, but also hard scientific work, which should be taken into account by the leaders of both countries. As a result of the discussions the "round table" adopted the Summary Document. Доп. сведения: Раздел - "Международные отношения" Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 GMT https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/29903 2000-01-01T00:00:00Z https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/29902 Заглавие документа: Декларация Бальфура 2 ноября 1917 г. и сионистский проект 18 июля 1917 г.: семантический анализ текста Авторы: Шевелев, Дмитрий Леонидович Аннотация: The paper is devoted to the consideration of the contents of the Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917 and the draft declaration of July 18, 1917. In December 1916 D. Lloyd George occupied the post of Prime Minister, and A. J. Balfour became Foreign Secretary. The new British Government was not satisfied with the Sykes — George-Picot — Sazonov Agreement, March 17 — October 23, 1916. Officials in British Government supposed that the Sykes — George-Picot — Sazonov Agreement had made too big concessions to France. In accordance with this Agreement, international administration had to be arranged by consent of the allies — Great Britain, France, Russia, and the representatives of the Sharif of Mecca — in the southern part of vilayet Beirut and northern part of sanjak Jerusalem. Great Britain took the seaport of Haiffa as porto franco and the seaport of Acre, and the rights of construction, management, and ownership of the railway, which had to link Haiffa with an independent Arab State or the Arab States Confederation. Zionist colonization of Palestine had to be continued, as well as the rights and privileges of the Orthodox Church preserved.During the First World War Zionist leaders discussed the possibility of establishment of British control over Palestine or a combined Franco-British condominium, and the establishment of national home for Jewish people in Palestine. British control over Palestine allowed to move the approaches to Suez Canal northeast, to have common boundaries with future French territories in Syria and Lebanon, and to surround Hijaz with the territories loyal to London. Also the following reasons roused London to act in Palestine fait accompli and to proclaim the Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917: 1) London wanted to create loyal (or allied) force in the Middle East in order to outstrip Berlin and Washington; 2) Great Britain wished to stop the negotiations of Zionist leaders in Germany and Austria with the Porte; 3) the British Cabinet wanted also to stop the massive wave of Jewish immigrants to the British Isles; 4) for Lloyd George and Balfour the project of establishment of the Jewish national home in Palestine had religious importance. The semantic analysis of the texts of the Balfour Declaration November 2, 1917, and the draft document of July 18, 1917, shows that the draft document does not do for the British Cabinet, because of the following reasons: 1) the draft document did not point out, under the protection of what country the Zionist movement had had to arrange Jewish national life in Palestine; 2) the draft document restricted Great Britain by precise aims and facilities of the Zionist movement; 3) Great Britain could not recognize Palestine as the only national home for Jewish people because the majority of the population there were Muslims and Christians. The draft document provided for London's recognition of Palestine as "the National home of the Jewish people", whereas the Declaration of 2 November spoke about favouring the view of the British Government towards "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for Jewish people". The final variant of the document was the compromise between London and the Zionist movement, and contained the proclamation of the British government's purposes towards Jewish national home in Palestine. Доп. сведения: Раздел - "Международные отношения" Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:00:00 GMT https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/29902 2000-01-01T00:00:00Z