<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ЭБ Коллекция:</title>
    <link>https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/257852</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-20T08:05:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations. – 2020. – No. 2</title>
      <link>https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/320060</link>
      <description>Заглавие документа: Journal of the Belarusian State University. International Relations. – 2020. – No. 2</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/320060</guid>
      <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Minority opinions in the decisions of the International Criminal Court</title>
      <link>https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/258007</link>
      <description>Заглавие документа: Minority opinions in the decisions of the International Criminal Court
Авторы: Nakoulma, M. V.
Аннотация: When exercising in a particular field of competence, the work of every judge lies in his inalienable freedom to pronounce the law, whether he expresses his own opinion separately or with a panel. Saying so introduces well our paper called “Mino­rity opinions in the decisions of the International Criminal Court”. Indeed, it emphasises a finding among the decisions issued by the judges of the International Criminal Court and reflects an analysis of the jurisprudence of this court. It sheds light on what interest there can be in minority opinions that embrace matters relating to a mode of exercising jurisdiction. In other words, how to explain the admissibility of minority opinions? This topic is very relevant given the extent of the practice of minority opinions in most international jurisdictions, whereas in international criminal law it is a matter not sufficiently&#xD;
studied by scholars.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/258007</guid>
      <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Negative impact of unilateral sanctions on the enjoyment of human rights in the COVID­19 pandemic</title>
      <link>https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/258006</link>
      <description>Заглавие документа: Negative impact of unilateral sanctions on the enjoyment of human rights in the COVID­19 pandemic
Авторы: Douhan, A. F.
Аннотация: The article is aimed to provide an overview of sanctions imposed by individual states and regional organisations without or beyond the authorisation of the UN Security Council in the course of COVID­19 pandemic and assess their impact on the enjoyment of different categories of human rights, identify the most vulnerable groups of population and efficacy of humani­ tarian exemptions as well as the availability of delivery of humanitarian aid. The article is based on the materials collected by the UN special rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights in the course of preparation of the annual report to the UN General Assembly but reflect a personal academic assessment of the authour and cannot be viewed as the position of the United Nations organs.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/258006</guid>
      <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The long and winding road of Belarus to sovereignty and recognition</title>
      <link>https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/258005</link>
      <description>Заглавие документа: The long and winding road of Belarus to sovereignty and recognition
Авторы: Kravchenko, O. I.
Аннотация: The path of Belarus to its sovereignty and international recognition has been long, difficult and trying. Elements of in­ ternational subjectivity originating from limited sovereignty have been present at different historical periods before Belarus’ gaining full-­fledged independence in 1991. The authour studies external perception and legal view of the limited status of Belarus as a subject of international relations during the Soviet period through analysing a failed legislative effort in the US Congress to recognise and establish diplomatic relations with Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://elib.bsu.by:443/handle/123456789/258005</guid>
      <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

